Heart Failure / KV-PREDICT · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 4, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned pilot feasibility study of an investigational, non-CE-marked Class IIa diagnostic device (KV-PREDICT) designed to acquire cardiac mechanical vibration signals in heart failure patients. The study will assess signal quality and reproducibility only, not diagnostic accuracy or clinical utility, and is not yet recruiting. No results are available from this registry record.
Interventional, Single Group, Open label, Diagnostic purpose. Heart Failure; age from 18 Years. Intervention: KV-PREDICT signal acquisition. n = 120. 1 site: Italy.
This is a planned pilot feasibility study of an investigational, non-CE-marked Class IIa diagnostic device (KV-PREDICT) designed to acquire cardiac mechanical vibration signals in heart failure patients. The study will assess signal quality and reproducibility only, not diagnostic accuracy or clinical utility, and is not yet recruiting. No results are available from this registry record.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
This study does not aim to support clinical decisions or change patient management. Professionals should await results demonstrating that the device can reliably acquire and extract cardiac parameters before considering any clinical application.
Pilot, single-center, non-invasive feasibility study of an unvalidated diagnostic device; no clinical outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, or predictive performance evaluated; enrollment not yet recruiting.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
This study does not aim to support clinical decisions or change patient management. Professionals should await results demonstrating that the device can reliably acquire and extract cardiac parameters before considering any clinical application.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07805213). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: KardioVis S.r.l.. Recruitment status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 120 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Heart Failure. Interventions: DEVICE: KV-PREDICT. Primary outcome measures: Quality and suitability of KV-PREDICT recordings for extraction of mechanical acceleration signals , During the single signal-acquisition session at the scheduled study visit (about 10 seconds of recording); Quality and suitability of KV-PREDICT recordings for extraction of mechanical gyroscopic signals , During the single signal-acquisition session at the scheduled study visit (about 10 seconds of recording). Brief summary: This is a pilot, single-center, non-invasive interventional study evaluating the performance of KV-PREDICT, an investigational diagnostic medical device (Class IIa, not CE-marked), in adult patients with heart failure. During a single scheduled outpatient visit, the device is placed externally on the chest, over clothing, and records a single-lead ECG together with cardiac mechanical vibration signals for about 10 seconds. The study assesses whether the device can acquire signals of adequate quality and reproducibility to allow extraction of mechanical and electromechanical cardiac parameters (such as systolic and diastolic time intervals and the amplitudes of mechanical vibrations corresponding to the heart sounds S1-S4). The study does not aim to support clinical decisions, does not change patient management, and does not evaluate the diagnostic or predictive performance of the device. About 120 patients across NYHA functional classes I-III and different left-ventricular function profiles will be enrolled. No direct clinical benefit to participants is expected; anticipated risks are minimal given the non-invasive, brief procedure.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.