Life sciences · Journal article
Clinical and Translational Science · September 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Lung cancer predominantly affects older adults who already experience comorbidities and are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Traditional DDI assessments often do not fully capture complex co-medication patterns observed in real-world practice due to the risk of introducing confounding factors. This study used U.S. Optum claims data from 2019 to 2024 to characterize co-medication patterns in predominately non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and map enzyme- and transporter-mediated liabilities across commonly used medications, chemotherapy agents, and biomarker-driven therapies. Potential DDI liabilities were further prioritized using a semi-quantitative clinical framework based on perpetrator strength, substrate sensitivity, narrow therapeutic index status, and available evidence. Frequently used medications included disease-specific supportive therapies such as ondansetron and dexamethasone, as well as treatments for common U.S. comorbidities such as cardiovascular and endocrine disorders. Many of the co-medications were substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of pathways critical for NSCLC treatments such as CYP3A, CYP2D6, P-gp, and OATP1B and additional risks were identified when giving treatments with acid-reducing agents or QT-prolonging drugs. These findings demonstrate how integrating real-world data (RWD) can strengthen DDI assessment by improving clinical trial design, informing risk-mitigation strategies, and supporting more patient-centric drug development.