Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We establish lower bounds for Hamiltonian property testing with access to the time-evolution operator but not its inverse. Each experiment may query the time-evolution operator multiple times, and distances between Hamiltonians are measured in the normalized Frobenius norm. In this model, we show that testing whether a Hamiltonian is $k$-local or $\varepsilon$-far from every $k$-local Hamiltonian requires $Ω(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total evolution time, matching the upper bound of Kallaugher and Liang (TQC'25). We also prove that testing whether an unknown Hamiltonian equals a target Hamiltonian or is $\varepsilon$-far from it requires $Ω(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total evolution time, matching the upper bound of Sinha and Tong (2025). These are the first lower bounds for natural problems in Hamiltonian learning and testing that rule out Heisenberg-limited scaling of $1/\varepsilon$. As a third result, we show that amplitude estimation to precision $\varepsilon$ requires $Ω(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total time evolution, recovering the result of Tang and Wright (QIP'26) in the continuous-time query model. All three results follow from the hardness of distinguishing the zero Hamiltonian from a suitably chosen ensemble of random Hamiltonians. We establish this hardness by adapting the continuous-time adversary method to forward Hamiltonian evolution.