Life sciences · Journal article
Acs Pharmacology & Translational Science · September 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Methotrexate (MTX) remains a cornerstone therapy in oncology and, to a lesser extent, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet its clinical utility in both settings is constrained by dose-limiting toxicities, interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, and the development of therapeutic resistance. Curcumin (CU), a pleiotropic small molecule with well-characterized anti-inflammatory, redox-modulating, and chemosensitizing properties, has emerged as a potential adjunct capable of enhancing MTX efficacy while mitigating adverse effects. This review provides a mechanistically integrated evaluation of MTX–CU combination strategies, with primary emphasis on the extensive preclinical evidence generated in oncology. In parallel, we critically examine the more limited yet mechanistically consistent body of evidence in RA. Through this analysis, we examine how CU modulates key signaling networks implicated in MTX response and toxicity, including NF-κB, MAPK, STAT, Nrf2, and oxidative stress pathways, and how these interactions influence apoptosis, macrophage polarization, drug resistance, and organ-specific toxicities. Particular emphasis is placed on nanoenabled codelivery systems that synchronize intracellular drug exposure, enhance folate receptor-mediated targeting, and improve therapeutic index through controlled release and microenvironment-responsive mechanisms. Preclinical oncology studies provide the most developed evidence base for MTX–CU cotherapy, spanning multiple cancer models, mechanistic studies, and nanoenabled delivery systems. However, formal drug-interaction evidence remains limited and heterogeneous: only four of approximately 25 oncology studies performed combination index analysis, yielding condition-specific synergy, additivity, or mixed context-dependent responses. In contrast, RA evidence is restricted to four in vivo Freund’s complete adjuvant studies and should be considered preliminary proof-of-concept. No published human trials have directly evaluated MTX–CU coadministration in cancer or RA. Accordingly, this review highlights key gaps in quantitative interaction analysis and PK–PD integration and proposes a translational framework incorporating biomarkers and precision nanomedicine. Overall, MTX–CU cotherapy remains a mechanistically supported but heterogeneous preclinical strategy, with the strongest rationale in oncology and RA representing an emerging application.