Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
European Journal of Psychotraumatology · September 16, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs following potentially traumatic experiences, but not everyone who experiences trauma develops PTSD. Genetic factors play an important role in shaping how individuals respond to trauma, reflecting gene-environment interaction. An open and important question in PTSD genetics research is the extent to which gene-environment interactions vary across specific traumas.Objective: We aimed to compare gene-environment interaction effects across a broad range of self-reported potentially traumatic experiences across the lifespan.Method: We analysed existing data from two large UK cohorts: the UK Biobank and GLAD-EDGI-COPING (N = 144,702). PTSD symptoms were assessed using the six-item abbreviated PTSD Checklist. We examined eleven self-reported trauma exposures, including five childhood traumas and six adulthood traumas. We conducted gene-environment interaction analyses for each trauma at three levels of genetic specificity: polygenic risk scores, specific genes, and specific genetic variants.Results: Childhood traumas showed stronger associations with PTSD symptoms and greater gene-environment interactions than adulthood traumas on average. Childhood emotional and physical neglect also demonstrated greater gene-environment interactions than childhood abuse. Interaction patterns varied across genes and variants, with several leading PTSD-associated genes (e.g. ANAPC, FAM120A, SGCD) having particularly strong interactions with certain traumas. Several genes (DTX4, PSMD12, TYW3, ZNF660) demonstrated consistently stronger interactions across all childhood or all adulthood traumas. Differences in gene-environment interactions across traumas were not explained by variation in exposure rates, associations with PTSD symptoms, or gene-environment correlations.Conclusions: Our findings are consistent with differential gene-environment interactions on PTSD across potentially traumatic experiences, with those in childhood exhibiting the strongest interactions. To account for the moderating role of trauma type on genetic associations, genetic research on PTSD should incorporate detailed trauma exposure information, which may improve PTSD risk prediction and support more personalised prevention approaches.