Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We study the list replicability number in the realizable PAC learning framework and prove that every concept class $H$ over a countable domain with Littlestone dimension $d$ and dual VC dimension $v^*$ satisfies \[ \mathrm{LR}(H)\leq 2^{O(d\min\{\log d,v^*\})}. \] This matches the worst-case lower bound of $2^{Ω(d)}$ up to a logarithmic factor in the exponent and exponentially improves the previous best upper bound $\mathrm{LR}(H)\le 2^{2^{O(d)}}$ of Bun, Livni, and Moran [FOCS 2020]. Unlike earlier bounds of $2^{O_ε(d^2)}$ for fixed accuracy $ε>0$ implied by the work of Ghazi, Golowich, Kumar, and Manurangsi [STOC 2021] and Lyu [STOC 2026], our bound is independent of $ε$. The $2^{O(d\log d)}$ bound follows from a new inductive framework for bounding list replicability that builds on the recent notion of irreducibility from differentially private learning. The $2^{O(dv^*)}$ bound follows from a simple globally stable learner that takes the majority vote of multiple empirical risk minimizers, with stability established using tools from stable regularity.