Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal · October 8, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Objective: The present study aims to compare field-in-field (FIF) radiation therapy, static intensity-modulated radiation therapy (S-IMRT), and dynamic static intensity-modulated radiation therapy (D-IMRT) techniques concerning dosimetric benefits for the treatment of pancreatic cancers. Materials and Methods: Sixteen pancreatic cancer patients who had undergone radiotherapy were selected for this study FIF, D-IMRT and S-IMRT plans were compared with respect to the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). All plans were designed to cover 95% of the dose in the target. Also, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and the monitor unit counts (MUs) were evaluated for all plans. Paired sample t-test was used for statistical analyses. Results: The CI and HI for D-IMRT and S-IMRT plans showed significant positive results than FIF plans. S-IMRT resulted in significantly reduced bilateral kidney V10 and V20 doses relative to FIF and D-IMRT plans (p