Prevena / Obesity / PICO · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 18, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned prospective randomized trial comparing three closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy devices in high-risk total knee arthroplasty patients, with a planned sample of 300 and 90-day follow-up for surgical complications. No results are yet available in this registry record; the study has not yet begun recruitment.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Open label, Treatment purpose. Wound Surgical, Diabetes, Obesity, Chronic Kidney Diseases, Smoking; age from 18 Years; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: NP Seal; PICO dressing; Prevena dressing. Compared with: Three-way comparison: NPseal vs. PICO vs. Prevena. n = 300. Single center: The Cleveland Clinic.
This is a planned prospective randomized trial comparing three closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy devices in high-risk total knee arthroplasty patients, with a planned sample of 300 and 90-day follow-up for surgical complications. No results are yet available in this registry record; the study has not yet begun recruitment.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is a planned clinical trial registration with no results reported; enrollment has not yet begun, making it an early-stage study that cannot yet provide evidence on effectiveness.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07770633). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: The Cleveland Clinic. Recruitment status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 300 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Wound Surgical, Diabetes, Obesity, Chronic Kidney Diseases, Smoking. Interventions: DEVICE: NP Seal; DEVICE: PICO; DEVICE: Prevena. Primary outcome measures: Surgical complications , From day of surgery to 90days post-op. Brief summary: This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial evaluating three commercially available closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) devices: NPseal, PICO, and Prevena, in adult patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who meet predefined high-risk criteria for wound complications. A total of approximately 300 participants will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to receive one of the three study dressings applied over the closed surgical incision at the end of the procedure. All participants will otherwise receive standard perioperative and postoperative care. The primary follow-up period will extend through 90 days after surgery. The primary objective is to compare the incidence of 90-day surgical site complications, including superficial infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, and hematoma, across the three dressing groups. Secondary objectives include evaluation of device usability, patient experience, and device-related issues (such as loss of seal, alarms, tubing or pump problems, fluid saturation, and premature dressing changes), as well as assessment of the interaction between skin closure method and device performance. Research-specific activities are limited to eligibility confirmation, informed consent, randomization, administration of a brief postoperative patient survey at approximately postoperative day 7 and/or dressing removal, provider assessment of the dressing at removal, and collection of clinical outcomes from the medical record. No additional blood draws, imaging, or invasive procedures are required for participation. This study is designed to address a gap in the literature by providing head-to-head comparative data on commonly used ciNPWT systems in a high-risk primary TKA population, with the goal of informing postoperative wound management strategies in clinical practice.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.