Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 22, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We trained 64 independently seeded networks in four configurations, continuing each to sustained convergence or a 40,000-epoch ceiling. We then asked whether an RSB-inspired distribution of pairwise weight overlaps changes across the grokking transition. It is the alignment step, not the overlap statistic, that determines what this registered probe can report. The registered implementation permutes hidden units without the corresponding bias and head-internal permutations and therefore does not preserve the network function. Every q_wt value computed through this alignment inherits the defect; q_fn does not, because it is computed from predictions of the unpermuted models. The numerical-precision requirement also failed, and an audit found protocol deviations. Consequently, the pre-registered rule gives no verdict: registered outcome UNDETERMINED (reason code C0_INSTRUMENT_INVALID). These data provide neither a confirmatory null nor a validated reading of the Parisi order parameter. Only frac40 cleared the 12/16 checkpoint-completeness requirement. For this configuration, a post-hoc criterion applied to the same data gave a Hartigan-dip interval containing zero (95% CI for Delta dip = [-0.017, 0.034]), whereas the overlap standard deviation increased by a factor of about 5.6. A post-hoc calibration assigns the dip test zero power at the simulated separations; the interval is therefore uninformative, not evidence of no change. The standard-deviation ratio is the only statistic here with power at the observed effect. Ensemble loss was near-flat only under the pre-specified 1% threshold. Finally, grokking rates of 0/16, 11/16 and 16/16 remain descriptive because train fraction is confounded with split identity.