Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
European Journal of Psychotraumatology · September 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background. There is limited access to evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in routine care. Therefore, scalable and resource-efficient treatment formats that are effective and acceptable are needed. We developed a blended format of cognitive therapy for PTSD, combining online modules with a limited number of therapy sessions, to improve resource efficiency, while maintaining the benefits of in-person therapy. This study aimed to explore patients' experiences of blended trauma-focused cognitive therapy (bTF-CT) in routine care.Method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants following completion or dropout from bTF-CT, as part of an open feasibility study. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis.Results. Participants described the treatment as helpful and flexible, and valued the combination of online modules and therapist sessions. Trauma-focused treatment components were experienced as both particularly beneficial and emotionally demanding, especially when conducted independently. Some participants reported disengagement related to emotional intensity, unmet needs and time pressure, suggesting room for improvement. However, engagement and satisfaction were facilitated by factors such as in-person therapist support, motivation and valued therapeutic gains.Conclusion. This is the first study exploring patient experiences of blended trauma-focused cognitive therapy in regular clinical settings. The results suggest that bTF-CT may be acceptable and helpful across primary and secondary care; however, refinements related to therapist support, treatment content, and tailoring treatment to personal needs may improve engagement and acceptability.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04881643.