Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Supportive Care in Cancer · September 16, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Purpose Work participation is one of the aims of cancer rehabilitation for individuals with breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to verify the feasibility of a multidisciplinary intervention addressing the work-related difficulties of working-age individuals with BC. Methods In this prospective feasibility study, employed individuals with BC who reported work-related difficulties were eligible. Participants were assessed at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) after baseline. The feasibility of the intervention was determined by calculating the percentages of eligibility, recruitment, dropout, adherence to and satisfaction with the support received, and return to work. Results Among 85 individuals, 32 (37.6%; 95% CI 27.4%–48.8%) met the eligibility criteria and were invited to participate, of whom 50% (95% CI 31.9%–68.1%) accepted. The highest dropout percentage was at T1 (12.5%; 95% CI 1.6%–38.3%). Adherence to the intervention was high throughout the study, with the highest percentage recorded at T1 (92.3%; 95% CI 64.0%–99.8%). At T4, all participants were satisfied with the intervention received. At T4, 10 participants out of 11 (95% CI 58.7%–99.8%) had achieved work reintegration. Occupational therapy was the most frequent intervention offered. Conclusion This study offers valuable insights into the feasibility of complex interventions. The multidisciplinary intervention was tailored to individual needs, and it seemed feasible as it was proposed. By supporting individuals with BC facing work-related difficulties, these findings may inform the design of appropriate interventions, especially in terms of recruitment strategies, intervention characteristics, and appointment scheduling. Trial registration ClinicalTrail.gov (ID NCT05309265, Registration date 25/03/2022)