Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 29, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
As network scale and uncertainty complicate automated penetration testing, reinforcement learning (RL) environments must support controlled evaluation under defensive and non-stationary conditions. We present DYNAS (Dynamic Network Attack Simulator), which combines parameterized large-scale scenario generation with stateful intrusion detection responses, explicit scan false-positive and false-negative noise, temporary service unavailability, and duration-based action timeouts. We further introduce Pen-DHRL, a recurrent manager--worker policy that selects persistent subgoals using IDS-conditioned global context. We compare Pen-DHRL with GNN, Invariant, and Attention baselines across four scenario variants and multiple training regimes. Under IDS-disabled training followed by IDS-enabled evaluation, Pen-DHRL obtains approximately 64\% and 24\% higher reward per step on Bridge and Dynamic, respectively, and approximately 26\% and 30\% more captured hosts on VarA and VarB than the next-best baseline. With all defensive dynamics active from the beginning of training, Pen-DHRL achieves positive mean episode returns in all four scenarios, whereas the flat baselines produce negative mean returns in all 12 architecture--scenario combinations; staged curriculum training produces positive mean returns across all 16 evaluated combinations.