Loading
Life sciences · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · October 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Observational Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06034990). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Chulalongkorn University. Recruitment status: COMPLETED. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 1000 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Critical Illness. Interventions: OTHER: 10-min online survey. Primary outcome measures: Fluid resuscitation practice pattern , 1/9/23-1/9/24. Brief summary: The objective of this study is to examine the use of different types of fluids for resuscitation in different phases of fluid management in 3 types of critically ill patients including (1) not bleeding, not septic but need volume resuscitation (representing normal condition), (2) bleeding but not septic (representing normal vascular integrity but with a loss of intravascular colloids), (3) septic (representing the condition with increase vascular permeability and endothelium damage) in the ICU within Southeast Asia. The data are collected by a 10-min online survey administered to included physicians which will be distributed via multiple online channels through representatives of each countries.