Loading
Intubation with GlideScope / Intratracheal Inbubation / Intubation with Airway Scope · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 14, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned interventional comparison of GlideScope versus Airway Scope for intubation in obese patients (BMI ≥40), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov but currently recruiting with no results yet published. The primary outcome is intubation completion time. No outcome data, efficacy claims, or safety findings can be made from this registry record alone.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Single masking, Supportive Care purpose. Intratracheal Inbubation; age from 18 Years. Intervention: Airway Scope Arm. Compared with: GlideScope Arm — Active Comparator. n = 70. 1 site: United States.
This is a planned interventional comparison of GlideScope versus Airway Scope for intubation in obese patients (BMI ≥40), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov but currently recruiting with no results yet published. The primary outcome is intubation completion time. No outcome data, efficacy claims, or safety findings can be made from this registry record alone.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
This trial is ongoing and has not yet reported results. Clinicians should not draw conclusions about the relative performance of these devices from this registry record; results will be needed to inform device selection in obese patients.
This is a recruiting clinical trial registry record with no reported results; it describes a planned comparison of two intubation devices in obese patients but carries no outcome data.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
This trial is ongoing and has not yet reported results. Clinicians should not draw conclusions about the relative performance of these devices from this registry record; results will be needed to inform device selection in obese patients.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07453563). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: University of New Mexico. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 70 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Intratracheal Inbubation. Interventions: DEVICE: Intubation with GlideScope; DEVICE: Intubation with Airway Scope. Primary outcome measures: Intubation completion time , Perioperative/Periprocedural. Brief summary: This study compares the time required to complete intubation in obese patients (Body Mass Index 40 or greater) when using either the GlideScope or Airway Scope video laryngoscope device to help place the endotracheal tube.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.