Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Physics informed machine learning provides a framework to study and simulate fluid dynamics, potentially at a fraction of the computational cost of traditional numerical methods, with the goal of improving the explainability, accuracy and robustness of purely data driven machine learning methods. In this work, we extend the hard constraint projection (HCP) method developed by Chen et al. [Journal of Computational Physics, 445, 110624, 2021] from a linear partial differential equation (PDE) to a nonlinear PDE: the 1D Burgers' equation. To strictly impose a discrete approximation of the governing equation, the Burgers' equation is first locally discretised (using a finite difference stencil) then decomposed into a constraint matrix and a prediction matrix. Using tools from linear algebra, the constraint matrix is used to construct a projection matrix. A physics informed neural network (PINN) [Raissi et al. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686, 2019] is used to predict the velocity, and a final unlearnable layer projects the velocity prediction to the hyperplane of exact solutions to a discretised form of the Burgers' equation. Our initial results indicate that the HCP-PINN initially trains similarly to an equivalent PINN, and as the PINN loss plateaus, the HCP-PINN loss continues to decline. When tested on a previously unseen uniform grid of points covering the domain, the HCP-PINN exhibits higher accuracy, converging to a data error approximately an order of magnitude lower than the comparable PINN. We also observe that the inclusion of the HCP layer results in better observance of the governing PDE. Our findings suggest that the HCP-PINN can be more robust to the selection of physics collocation points, and less dependent on collocation point quantity.