Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Swiss Medical Weekly · October 22, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Guidelines recommend early initiation of palliative care alongside anticancer therapy. However, ongoing treatment is often associated with delayed referral to palliative care. Factors that positively influence the initiation of palliative care have been studied in the past, but there is a gap in research regarding the individual degree of influence these factors have on the willingness to initiate palliative care. Therefore, we explored the degree of influence of 11 different factors on willingness to initiate palliative care, focusing on communicational and relational aspects. METHODS: We conducted a factorial survey among 1572 members of the Swiss public. Participants were presented with vignettes designed to explore willingness to start palliative care. A response format ranging from -5 to +5 was provided. Vignettes were analysed using mixed-effects regression models. RESULTS: The physician having enough time for the conversation, the provision of detailed and understandable information, and an expression about continuity of care led to the strongest increase in willingness. There was also an increase in willingness when treatment recommendations were based on experience and patient preferences, as well as with self-disclosure, the expression of sadness by the physician, work experience, a prior patient-physician relationship and older patient age. CONCLUSION: This study offers insight into the decision-making process regarding the initiation of palliative care at an advanced stage of disease progression. Supportive communication practices and expressions of understanding for the other led to a higher willingness to start palliative care. These aspects should be considered in discussions about advanced cancer in clinical practice, as well as emphasised in medical education.