Life sciences · Journal article
Neurobiology of Aging · September 10, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Understanding cognitive aging requires approaches that capture individual variability while enabling integration across studies. In rodent models, behavioral data are central to this effort, yet cross-laboratory differences in experimental design limit comparability and constrain secondary analysis. To address this gap, we developed the Individual Differences in Cognitive Aging Rodent Datasets (ID-CARD), a first-of-its-kind collaborative repository aggregating trial-level Morris water maze data from multiple laboratories. ID-CARD is designed to support large-scale, integrative analyses and to facilitate secondary use of existing behavioral data in alignment with emerging data-sharing and transparency initiatives. Rather than imposing retrospective harmonization of experimental protocols, we implemented a normalization and modeling framework that enables comparison of learning trajectories while preserving meaningful variation across studies. Behavioral data from > 5000 rats spanning common strains, both sexes, and multiple ages were normalized in training and performance domains and fit with a logarithmic function to derive an error accumulation rate coefficient (EARC) as a measure of spatial learning. Age was strongly associated with increased EARC, indicating attenuated learning, even after adjusting for non-spatial cue performance. Analyses of goodness of fit revealed systematic structure in learning dynamics, where age was associated with reduced learning-curve conformity after accounting for overall performance. Inter-individual variability in spatial learning also increased with age, with strain-specific interactions. These findings demonstrate that integrated analysis of heterogeneous behavioral datasets can yield robust, individual-level insights into cognitive aging. ID-CARD provides a scalable resource and analytic framework to advance discovery in behavioral neuroscience by enabling reuse, integration, and comparative analysis of existing data.