Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 26, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Data distributions often possess one or more symmetries: for example, all orientations of any specific dog are included in the distribution of all possible dog pictures. Despite the omnipresence of such symmetries, modern generative modeling approaches may fail to incorporate or learn them, which can lead to lower sample efficiency and poorer generalization. To what extent do diffusion models fail to learn data distribution symmetries, and what sources of symmetry breaking are most responsible? Here, we answer this question in the theoretically tractable setting of linear diffusion models. We show that of three potential sources of symmetry breaking---a non-symmetric initial weight matrix, a noisy learning target, and finite-sample noise---target noise produces the most robust symmetry breaking, since it persists even in the sample-rich regime. Using local laws from random matrix theory, we derive formulas for average symmetry error in fairly general cases involving symmetry within a subspace and show that smaller symmetries are harder to learn.