Life sciences · Journal article
Adipocyte · October 9, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
In vitro modelling of adipose tissue (AT) commonly employs 2D systems, which do not fully capture the complexity of AT, lacking cell-cell interactions and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling. Despite the innovations in 3D culture systems offering physiologically relevant AT platforms, the field lacks consensus and cross-protocol method comparison. We performed a comparative analysis of three scaffold-free spheroid-generation techniques: Ultra Low Attachment plates (ULA), Hanging Drops (HD), and Microwell Culture Plates (MCP), utilizing human AT-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Each method produced viable spheroids of similar size and morphology within 48 hours. However, MCP demonstrated greater uniformity and a significant increase in mass density when compared to ULA and HD. Adipogenic media increased spheroid size in ULA and MCP, but not in HD spheroids. Notably, the diameter of ULA spheroids was 2- and 6-times larger compared to HD and MCP ones, respectively, regardless of adipogenic induction. Gene expression analysis indicated that all techniques led to PPARγ and ADIPOQ expression during adipogenesis. All methods supported adipocyte differentiation, as evidenced by lipid droplet accumulation, PLIN1, CD36, and HSL expression, and ECM rearrangement. These findings suggest that all the described techniques constitute a robust platform for producing adipogenesis-competent spheroids, while method-specific differences suggest an application-dependent choice.