Loading
EHR-Connected Scale / Standard Care / Simple Scale · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 4, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a completed feasibility and acceptability study of self-weighing interventions (simple scale vs. EHR-connected scale vs. usual care) in 102 adolescents with obesity, conducted at a single centre. No efficacy or outcome results are posted in this registry record; the study measures only implementation feasibility, perceptions, and recruitment yield at 12 weeks.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Open label, Treatment purpose. Adolescent Obesity; age from 12 Years; to 17 Years. Intervention: Standard Care; Simple Scale; EHR-Connected Scale. Compared with: Usual Care (standard obesity treatment).. n = 102. 1 site: United States.
This is a completed feasibility and acceptability study of self-weighing interventions (simple scale vs. EHR-connected scale vs. usual care) in 102 adolescents with obesity, conducted at a single centre. No efficacy or outcome results are posted in this registry record; the study measures only implementation feasibility, perceptions, and recruitment yield at 12 weeks.
No efficacy or safety results are reported in this registry record; this record describes study design and recruitment only.
No clinical impact can be determined from this registry record, as results are not posted. Clinicians should await publication of outcomes to assess whether EHR-connected scales improve engagement, feasibility, or weight outcomes in adolescent obesity care.
This is a completed registry record of a small, single-centre interventional study in adolescent obesity with feasibility and acceptability endpoints; no results are posted, so the evidence base is not yet established.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
No clinical impact can be determined from this registry record, as results are not posted. Clinicians should await publication of outcomes to assess whether EHR-connected scales improve engagement, feasibility, or weight outcomes in adolescent obesity care.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04837586). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: University of Minnesota. Recruitment status: COMPLETED. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 102 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Adolescent Obesity. Interventions: OTHER: Standard Care; DEVICE: Simple Scale; DEVICE: EHR-Connected Scale. Primary outcome measures: Feasibility of connecting the Smart scales to the EHR and access home weights through the EHR , 12 weeks; Feasibility of collecting daily weights. , 12 weeks; Perceptions of daily weight tracking. , 12 weeks. Brief summary: 99 patients age 12 to \<18 years old with obesity (BMI \>/=95th percentile), will be randomized to one of three treatment interventions: 1. Usual Care 2. Usual Care plus advice to weigh daily on simple scale 3. Usual Care plus advice to weigh-daily on an EHR-connected scale Survey data collected at baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12-weeks, and qualitative interviews at 12 weeks, will assess acceptability, safety, self-efficacy, and BMI. Recruitment will also be assessed (% eligible patients who consent). In order to understand real-world feasibility of this intervention, the clinic staff will work with patients to connect the scales to Epic.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.