Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 13, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
The rapid advancement of image-to-text extraction systems and large language models (LLMs) poses new challenges for educational assessment by making assignment materials easy to transcribe and solve with minimal human effort. To address this problem, we present AIRRI (Artificial Intelligence Resilient Reading Interface), a framework for generating machine-resistant educational content, a dataset of higher-education assignments for evaluation, and an initial evaluation of the human readability of AIRRI machine-resistant text designs. AIRRI employs two categories of machine-resistance techniques. First, AIRRI applies image transformations including character spacing, word spacing, line spacing, character opacity variation, stripe overlays, and image noise. Second, AIRRI applies decision-based adversarial attacks: RayS, SurFree, and ADBA. We evaluate AIRRI against three image-to-text systems: Tesseract, EasyOCR, and the transformer-based GOT-OCR2 model. Our results show that AIRRI substantially degrades automated text extraction performance. AIRRI increased character error rates for EasyOCR (6.9% to 55.9%), Tesseract (2.3% to 100.0%), and GOT-OCR2 (30.7% to 48.1%). Word error rates increased for EasyOCR (24.9% to 96.7%) and Tesseract (10.7% to 100.0%). Among the evaluated decision-based attacks, ADBA consistently produced the largest degradation in image-to-text performance, while RayS and SurFree produced more moderate reductions. EasyOCR and Tesseract were generally more susceptible to both image-based and adversarial perturbations than the transformer-based GOT-OCR2 model. Our findings suggest that AIRRI can significantly reduce the reliability of image-to-text-to-LLM workflows, increasing the effort required for AI-assisted assignment completion.