Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Transfer learning is a highly successful learning paradigm in deep learning which leverages knowledge from one task and applies it to another. Despite its success, the necessary conditions for knowledge transfer are unclear and require further research. In this dissertation, our aim is to understand transferability a little better by answering the following question: Does good generalization on a source task necessarily imply transferability to a related target task? We hypothesize the answer is negative, and attempt to find counterexamples via adversarial attacks on the transfer learning procedure. Over three types of adversarial attacks, our empirical results show a strong relationship between generalization on the source task and transferability. These results do not rule out generalization on the source task as a sufficient condition for successful transfer.