Life sciences · Journal article
Nursing Open · August 1, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This cross-sectional study reports that kinesiophobia is prevalent in 80.41% of post-PCI patients and identifies 12 associated factors including psychological distress, low physical activity, and reduced exercise self-efficacy. The associations are statistically significant but correlational; causation cannot be inferred from this design, and findings are limited to a Chinese population with convenience sampling.
Multicenter cross-sectional study. Patients following percutaneous coronary intervention from eight tertiary hospitals in China; 1145 recruited, 970 with complete data analysed.. Intervention: Kinesiophobia assessment and associated psychosocial and clinical factor measurement. n = 970. Eight tertiary hospitals in China.
Kinesiophobia prevalence 80.41% (780/970 patients) High physical activity associated with 60% lower odds of kinesiophobia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25–0.65, p < 0.001) Anxiety increased odds of kinesiophobia by 21% per point (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12–1.29, p < 0.001)
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The high prevalence of kinesiophobia in post-PCI patients suggests routine screening may be warranted; however, the cross-sectional design prevents determination of whether identified factors are modifiable targets or confounders. Prospective studies are needed before implementing the suggested nursing interventions.
Cross-sectional study of prevalence and associations in a single-country convenience sample; identifies correlates but cannot establish causation, and findings require confirmation in prospective designs before clinical implementation.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
The high prevalence of kinesiophobia in post-PCI patients suggests routine screening may be warranted; however, the cross-sectional design prevents determination of whether identified factors are modifiable targets or confounders. Prospective studies are needed before implementing the suggested nursing interventions.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
AIM: To investigate the prevalence and associated factors of kinesiophobia after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DESIGN: A multicenter cross-sectional study. METHODS: We collected data of post-PCI patients who were recruited via convenience sampling from cardiology departments of eight tertiary hospitals between 1 November 2022 and 31 December 2023. Kinesiophobia was assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart (TSK-SV Heart). Exercise self-efficacy, depression, anxiety, stress, and social support were evaluated by validated instruments. Participants' demographic and objective socioeconomic factors were also collected. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the associated factors of kinesiophobia. RESULTS: Of 1145 recruited patients, 970 (84.72%) provided complete data and were included in the final analysis, of which 780 (80.41%) exhibited kinesiophobia. Factors significantly associated with kinesiophobia in the binary logistic regression analysis included: single status (vs. married: OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.22-0.79, p = 0.008), retired (vs. freelancers: OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.22-2.93, p = 0.004), had beyond 3 children (vs. 1 child: OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99, p = 0.045), generally familiar with illness (vs. not familiar: OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.37-2.93, p < 0.001), comorbid hypertension (vs. no hypertension: OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.05-2.13, p = 0.028), participated in cardiac rehabilitation (vs. did not participate: OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.06-2.19, p = 0.023), moderate physical activity (vs. low: OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.97, p = 0.034), and high physical activity (vs. low: OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25-0.65, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with kinesiophobia occurrence (p < 0.05). For each one-point increase in stress, anxiety, and objective support, the odds of kinesiophobia increased by 9% (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15, p = 0.008), 21% (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12-1.29, p < 0.001), and 9% (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19, p = 0.027), respectively. For each one-point increase in depression and SEE-C score, the odds of kinesiophobia decreased by 11% (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96, p = 0.001) and 1% (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Kinesiophobia is highly prevalent among post-PCI patients. Identified associated factors include marital status, occupational status, number of children, illness familiarity, hypertension comorbidity, cardiac rehabilitation participation, physical activity level, levels of psychological distress, objective support, and exercise self-efficacy. These findings highlight potential targets for intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Nurses should integrate routine kinesiophobia screening using the TSK-SV Heart scale into post-PCI assessment protocols. Risk-stratified screening should prioritize married or retired patients, those with fewer than three children, individuals with hypertension, and those with low baseline physical activity. For patients with low exercise self-efficacy, nurses can use motivational interviewing; for those with elevated anxiety or stress, collaborative cognitive-behavioural therapy is recommended. These nursing actions can reduce kinesiophobia and improve cardiac rehabilitation adherence. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? Kinesiophobia is a common but under-recognized barrier to cardiac rehabilitation in post-PCI patients, yet its prevalence and modifiable factors in Chinese populations remain poorly understood. What were the main findings? The prevalence of kinesiophobia was 80.41%. Independent associated factors included marital status, retirement, number of children, illness familiarity, hypertension, cardiac rehabilitation participation, physical activity level, anxiety, stress, depression, objective support, and exercise self-efficacy. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The findings directly inform cardiac nursing practice in China and similar settings, enabling nurses to identify high-risk patients and implement targeted psychosocial interventions. REPORTING METHOD: This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline for cross-sectional observational studies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contributed to the design, conduct, analysis, or interpretation of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This observational study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2300070396; https://www.chictr.org.cn/).
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.