Life sciences · Journal article
Frontiers in Medicine · October 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Over the past few decades, the drug-diagnostic codevelopment model has gradually transformed oncology drug development. In this model, a predictive biomarker assay, known as a companion diagnostic (CDx), is developed alongside the drug. The incorporation of CDx assays in clinical drug development has facilitated the use of the enrichment trial design, in which patients are selected based on molecular characteristics linked to the drug mechanism of action. In this survey, oncology drugs associated with a CDx assay approved by the FDA until the end of 2025 were investigated, and drug class, clinical trial design, study endpoint, patient population, Orphan Drug status, and expedited review were recorded. During this period, 87 cancer drugs were identified, of which 62 (71%) were indicated for treatment of solid tumors. Kinase inhibitors were the dominant drug class, accounting for 34 drugs (55%). A large proportion of the drugs had obtained Orphan Drug status (63%) and Breakthrough Therapy designation (77%). The average patient population sufficient to obtain FDA approval was 279, with 16 (26%) drugs approved based on fewer than 100 patients, often supported by single-arm, open-label clinical trials. For 49 (79%) of the drugs, efficacy documentation was generated based on one single clinical trial. The primary endpoint in these trials was most often objective response rate and progression-free survival. When evaluating the enrichment trial design, the number of patients required to demonstrate clinical efficacy and obtain FDA approval is low compared to the traditional all-comers design, which means that safety evaluation could be compromised.