Life sciences · Journal article
Proceedings of Anticancer Research · October 15, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Exercise oncology has moved from epidemiological association to mechanistic science, yet contracting skeletal muscle is still treated in most oncological models as a bystander rather than as an active regulator of tumour biology. This review integrates evidence from prospective cohorts, controlled exercise trials, tumour-bearing animal models and human ex vivo serum and extracellular vesicle (EV) studies into a single three-level muscle-tumour crosstalk axis. At the first level, repeated contraction remodels the muscle secretome, releasing soluble myokines and EV cargo that act directly on neoplastic cells. At the second level, each exercise bout—and, cumulatively, its chronic repetition—reshapes systemic immunometabolic conditions: immune-cell trafficking, catecholamine and substrate availability, insulin signalling and low-grade inflammation. At the third level, these systemic changes converge on the tumour microenvironment, altering immune infiltration, vascular function, hypoxia, drug delivery and proliferative signalling. The same axis is supported in reverse by the consistent prognostic weight of sarcopenia and cancer cachexia. The 2025 CHALLENGE trial, which improved disease-free survival after adjuvant therapy for colon cancer, supplies the first survival-grade clinical evidence. The review closes with a mechanism-informed prescription framework and a ranked set of unresolved questions concerning EV standardisation, dose-response, tumour-type specificity and synergy with immunotherapy.