Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 8, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Sensor outages can conceal prediction-interval coverage deficits behind acceptable marginal performance, while unavailable future readings leave some issued forecasts unscorable. We present a measurement-record audit that links issue-time outage duration, original target availability, and time-uniform statistical evidence. The audit retains complete forecast keys, batches all sensors and overlapping horizons at each measurement tick, and projects simultaneous covered-count and scored-count bounds onto a cumulative conditional expected coverage ratio. This target is distinguished from empirical coverage and outage-conditional population coverage. Selected traffic and air-quality results illustrate the gap between pooled and long-outage coverage; in METR-LA, only 7.6% of issued long-gap forecasts have originally observed targets. Of 30 primary sequential outage-state audits, 26 are inconclusive and four lack scored support. This concise presentation gives the core construction and selected aggregate evidence without the full experimental supplement.