Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Implementation Science Communications · September 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Background Supportive learning environments are foundational to clinician well-being, workforce retention, and delivery of high-quality care. Prior evidence suggests that the Relational Playbook, an evidence-based leadership development program, can cultivate these environments. Leadership coaching may further enhance Playbook implementation, but its effectiveness has not been tested. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility (AAF) of the Playbook and explore leadership coaching as an implementation strategy to support Playbook adoption and team well-being. Methods A pilot site-randomized trial was conducted in six Veterans Health Administration (VA) cardiac catheterization labs. Sites were randomized (3 intervention, 3 control) to receive the Relational Playbook with or without six months of leadership coaching. AAF were assessed using a validated implementation instrument (Weiner, 2017) using 12 Likert-type items (range 1–5; higher scores reflect greater AAF) among participating managers at study completion. Secondary outcomes of team learning environment and well-being were assessed through pre-post intervention surveys by managers and staff. Difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses were conducted descriptively because of the small sample size. Adoption of Playbook practices, coaching experience, and implementation perceptions were assessed through surveys and qualitative interviews. Results Ten managers enrolled and six completed all aspects of the study (60% retention), representing all six sites. Among completers, AAF ratings for the Playbook were high with median scores greater than 4 across domains. Learning environment and well-being analyses were based on 41 baseline and 20 follow-up survey responses. Compared with control sites, intervention sites showed a relative reduction in burnout (DiD = -0.4) and intent to leave (DiD = -0.6) and a relative increase in job satisfaction (DiD = + 1.1). Adoption of Playbook practices was greater in intervention sites compared to controls. Participants reported that coaching provided real-time feedback, facilitated Playbook adoption, and supported team professional development and well-being. Conclusions Leadership coaching enhanced Playbook adoption and preliminary data suggested a positive shift in cardiology team well-being. These findings support conducting larger-scale trials and implementing the combined approach across additional high-intensity clinical departments to strengthen learning environments and workforce resilience. Trial registration Registered on 6/13/2024; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06456021.