Loading
Life sciences · Review
Oncoimmunology · October 31, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Review.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Some patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) progress at a few sites while disease elsewhere stays controlled, a pattern consistent with focal, oligo-acquired immune escape rather than systemic treatment failure. Ablating the escaping focus may eliminate the resistant clone and preserve an otherwise effective immunotherapy line. We performed a PRISMA 2020-compliant, PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis of local ablative treatment (LAT) for oligoprogressive or oligo-resistant metastatic NSCLC during active ICI therapy, with continuation of the same immunotherapy line after LAT. MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 8, 2026. From 1270 records, 22 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Four studies, one randomized subgroup, and three retrospective cohorts contributed to each primary analysis. LAT-oriented management was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS; pooled hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.33–0.62; 95% prediction interval [PI] 0.28–0.74; I2 = 0%) and overall survival (OS; pooled HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27–0.63; 95% PI 0.24–0.69; I2 = 0%). PFS and OS estimates were consistent across sensitivity analyses, including the exclusion of the one PFS estimate measured to a second progression. The evidence is predominantly observational and of low certainty, reflecting the current absence of NSCLC-specific randomized trials. On this evidence, LAT, delivered predominantly as stereotactic body radiotherapy, may be considered a continuation-enabling option for carefully selected patients with focal progression on otherwise effective immunotherapy, pending ongoing randomized trials.