Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
There is growing evidence that the performance of a neural network depends largely on a small subset of its weights, which are typically identified by training a dense network and pruning it afterwards. Within a Bayesian framework, pruning can be directly incorporated through a spike-and-slab prior, providing a proper treatment of the uncertainties involved, both with respect to pruning and to parameter uncertainty. In Bayesian neural networks (BNNs), sampling by MCMC is notoriously hard. We demonstrate that modern Monte Carlo methods based on piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs) can be used to sample posteriors of BNNs asymptotically exact whenever numerically constructed rate bounds hold. Spike-and-slab priors can be incorporated through sticky versions of the PDMPs, setting weights exactly to zero during sampling. We examine the predictive performance and convergence of the samplers, and show that sparse BNNs sampled this way can be more robust to input noise than dense ones.