Life sciences · Journal article
Advanced Healthcare Materials · October 9, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Precision oncology has become a focus of both clinical practice and basic research. With the rapid evolution of organoid culture techniques and the integration of biomedical engineering approaches, patient-derived organoid (PDO) systems are playing an increasingly pivotal role in precision cancer therapy. By recapitulating patient-specific tumor characteristics, these platforms demonstrate considerable potential for clinical translation. Despite remarkable progress, the impact of PDO models on real-world therapeutic decision-making remains limited. Most existing studies have focused on preclinical concept validations or small-scale trials, leaving a substantial gap before these models can be implemented to guide individualized cancer therapy. This review examines on-demand PDO generation through the selection of sample-processing methods, matrices, and platform architectures matched to specific treatment-response questions. We compare conventional and engineered systems in terms of biological complexity, sample requirements, reported timelines, assay readouts, and clinical evidence. Particular attention is given to engineering trade-offs and the distinction between technical feasibility, clinical response correlation, and demonstrated utility in treatment selection.