Life sciences · Journal article
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · September 24, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) benefit only a subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), largely because of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment enriched with M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). C5aR1 is highly expressed on HCC TAMs, but no C5aR1-targeted cancer therapy has been approved. LukS-PV, a Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin component, is a natural ligand for human C5aR1. However, whether LukS-PV can reprogram TAMs and enhance immunotherapy in HCC remains unclear. Methods To define the therapeutic potential and mechanism of LukS-PV, subcutaneous and immunotherapy-refractory hydrodynamic tail vein injection-induced spontaneous HCC models were established in humanized C5AR1 knock-in mice and wild-type controls. Macrophage depletion experiments were conducted to assess the contribution of macrophages to LukS-PV-mediated antitumor activity. These models were used to evaluate LukS-PV alone and in combination with PD-1 blockade. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed to characterize the cellular composition and immune landscape of tumor tissues. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence were used for validation in vivo. In vitro macrophage-polarization assays were performed for functional validation. Transcriptomic and molecular analyses were further conducted to investigate the signaling mechanisms associated with LukS-PV treatment. Results LukS-PV significantly suppressed HCC growth in h C5AR1 mice but not in wild-type controls, supporting a human C5aR1-dependent mechanism in this experimental system. LukS-PV reshaped the tumor immune landscape by shifting TAMs from immunosuppressive M2-like phenotypes toward inflammatory M1-like states. This macrophage reprogramming was accompanied by increased CD8⁺T-cell infiltration, enhanced effector activation and reduced T-cell exhaustion. Mechanistically, LukS-PV inhibited C5aR1-dependent PI3K/AKT signalling in macrophages, suppressing the GSK3β/CREB/IL-10 axis while promoting NF-κB-associated inflammatory activation. Reduced TAM-derived IL-10 contributed to suppression of HCC progression and restoration of CD8⁺T-cell effector function. Consistent with this immune remodeling, LukS-PV enhanced the antitumor efficacy of PD-1 blockade. Conclusion LukS-PV targets human C5aR1 to reprogram immunosuppressive TAMs and enhance responsiveness to PD-1 blockade. These findings identify LukS-PV-mediated C5aR1 targeting as a promising translational strategy to overcome immunotherapy resistance in HCC.