Loading
Life sciences · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · October 27, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Interventional Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07896343). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: University of California, San Francisco. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 10 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Depression - Major Depressive Disorder. Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: Approach-Avoidance Decision-Making Task. Primary outcome measures: Difference in Orbitofrontal Cortex High-Frequency Activity (70-150 Hz) Between Approach and Avoidance Decisions , During task session(s) completed during inpatient sEEG monitoring, from enrollment up to 3 weeks. Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to understand how the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), a region at the front of the brain, guides decisions about whether to pursue a possible reward when doing so also carries a risk of loss, and how this process is altered in depression. People with depression are often less motivated by rewards and more sensitive to potential losses, leading them to avoid situations that others would approach. The OFC is thought to play a central role in these "approach or avoid" decisions, but how it normally does so, and what goes wrong in depression, is not well understood. This study asks two questions: (1) How does activity in different parts of the OFC signal the decision to approach or avoid? (2) Does this activity differ in people with depression in a way that explains a bias toward avoidance? We hypothesize that the medial OFC (toward the middle of the brain) signals approach, the lateral OFC (toward the side of the brain) signals avoidance, and that in depression the medial OFC signal is weakened, tipping decisions toward avoidance. Participants are adults who are hospitalized with stereo-EEG (sEEG) electrodes already placed in the brain by their medical team, either to locate the source of seizures in epilepsy or as part of a separate clinical trial for treatment-resistant depression. The electrodes are placed for clinical reasons only, not for this study. During their hospital stay, participants complete a short, game-like computer task (about 20 minutes per session) in which they repeatedly choose whether to approach or avoid options that offer different chances of reward and loss. Their choices and reaction times are recorded along with brain activity from the existing electrodes, and participants rate their mood before each session. The researchers will compare OFC activity during approach versus avoid decisions, use mathematical models of decision-making to measure how strongly each participant weighs rewards and losses, and compare participants with and without depression. No drugs, devices, or brain stimulation are given as part of this study. The findings are intended to guide the development of more targeted brain-stimulation treatments for treatment-resistant depression.