Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Journal of Nuclear Medicine · October 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
[212Pb]Pb-ADVC001 (212Pb-ADVC001) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy with high linear energy transfer derived predominantly from the alpha-emission of its 212Pb payload which, upon decay, delivers potent ionizing radiation directly to the tumor. TheraPb (NCT05720130) is a first-in-human dose-escalation and optimization study evaluating 212Pb-ADVC001 in metastatic androgen pathway modulation-resistant prostate cancer (mAPM-R, formerly metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer). Phase 1 results, including available long-term safety and efficacy outcomes, are presented. Methods: Participants with progressive mAPM-R previously treated with ≥1 androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor and ≥1 taxane chemotherapy (unless contraindicated/declined) were enrolled. Escalating doses of 60–200 MBq 212Pb-ADVC001 were administered at prespecified intervals every 6, 4, 2, or 1 week(s) for up to 6 doses across 7 dose-schedule cohorts (interval 3 + 3 design). The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) with primary endpoints of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, overall response rate (ORR), and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Results: Twenty-two participants were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 14.1 months (IQR 8.8–17.1). No DLTs were observed and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment-related AEs (TRAE) were dry mouth (18/22 participants [82%], all grade 1–2) and nausea (14/22 participants [64%], all grade 1–2); there were no grade 4–5 or serious TRAEs. The selected RP2D are 160 and 200 MBq. At these dose levels, 12/15 (80%) participants had a PSA decline of ≥50% and the median rPFS from C1D1 was 11.2 months (95% CI 2.0–not estimable) as of data cutoff. ORR was 100%, with centrally confirmed objective responses in all 5 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)-evaluable participants treated at the RP2D. Conclusion:212Pb-ADVC001 was well tolerated up to 200 MBq, including at weekly dosing, and showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in pretreated mAPM-R. Two RP2D, 160 and 200 MBq, are under evaluation in phase 2.