Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 4, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Bayesian experimental design (BED) is a principled framework for intelligent data acquisition with applications across a wide range of scientific and industrial domains. However, the development and adoption of BED remains hindered by a lack of standardised software and benchmarks. Existing methods are typically implemented in bespoke codebases and evaluated on a small subset of tasks, making methods difficult to apply, compare, or extend. To address this, we present TestBED, a general-purpose, open-source toolkit for Bayesian experimental design. TestBED decomposes the BED process into modular, reusable components spanning tasks, objectives, training mechanisms, policy architectures, and evaluation procedures, together with scalable implementations of core primitives such as expected information gain estimators. We provide a wide range of these components, which can be freely composed, allowing existing methods to be reproduced within a common framework, while also enabling previously unexplored configurations and new methodologies to be easily implemented and evaluated. Using TestBED, we further conduct a large-scale benchmark of contemporary BED methods, including controlled studies of under-appreciated but surprisingly critical methodological choices, such as the importance of time embeddings in design policy architectures. By providing a modular, extensible software foundation and a reproducible benchmarking suite, we hope that TestBED will accelerate methodological research in BED and lower the barrier to its real-world application.