Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 9, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We study simultaneous competitive and regret guarantees for TCP acknowledgment. Each acknowledgment serves all pending packets, and the objective is to minimize the total acknowledgment and waiting costs. It is well known that no deterministic online algorithm achieves a competitive ratio better than $2$. Given $k$ randomized online experts and $0<\varepsilon<1$, we construct a randomized online algorithm whose realized total cost is always at most $(2+\varepsilon)$ times the offline optimal cost $\mathrm{OPT}$ and whose expected regret against the expert with the smallest realized cost is $O(\sqrt{\mathrm{OPT}\log(k+1)}+\log(1/\varepsilon))$. The algorithm requires no advance knowledge of the number of packets or $\mathrm{OPT}$. Our algorithm controls switching costs between experts and uses the gap between the permitted competitive bound and its current cost to determine when to learn. We also prove lower bounds showing that, for $k\ge 2$, this regret bound is asymptotically optimal in $\mathrm{OPT}$, $k$, and $\varepsilon$, and that $\varepsilon>0$ is necessary for sublinear regret.