Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 5, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
The CADENCE algorithm solves the Partially Observable Cooperative Guard Art Gallery Problem (POCGAGP) with formal coverage and connectivity guarantees, but leaves unspecified which valid corner each agent should be deployed to, a choice that strongly affects efficiency. We introduce two learned corner-selection heuristics that preserve these guarantees: a CNN scoring candidates on a grid encoding, and a GATv2 network trained with Deep Q-Learning (DQN) on a visibility graph. Across 7,500 runs on random orthogonal environments (50x50 to 250x250), our heuristics outperform baseline CADENCE in both steps to full coverage and peak agent count, with gains growing with scale, and improve on Incremental Self-Deployment (ISDA) baselines in agent utilization while providing guarantees ISDA lacks. Learned corner selection thus improves CADENCE in speed and agent utilization at no cost to its formal properties.