Loading
Life sciences · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · November 6, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Interventional Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07184866). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India. Recruitment status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 110 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF). Interventions: DRUG: Vitamin C; OTHER: Standard of Care (SOC). Primary outcome measures: Resolution of septic shock at 96 hours (Day 4) , Day 4 (96 hours) after randomization. Brief summary: This study is testing whether Vitamin C can help improve kidney function and survival in very sick patients with liver disease. Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) often develop serious infections that can lead to septic shock and kidney injury, which are major causes of death. In this randomized controlled trial, patients with ACLF and septic shock will be assigned to receive either: 1. Standard medical treatment alone, or 2. Standard medical treatment plus intravenous Vitamin C. Vitamin C is a safe, inexpensive antioxidant that may reduce inflammation, improve circulation, and protect the kidneys. The study will compare how well patients recover from septic shock and kidney injury in the two groups. Blood and urine samples will also be collected to look for biological markers that can predict outcomes.