Life sciences · Journal article
American Journal of Case Reports · November 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Probable chronic-phase brucellosis (undulant fever) with clinically suspected recurrent right epididymo-orchitis Symptoms: Chronic recurrent fever • night sweats • asthenia • weight loss • recurrent right scrotal pain and swelling • right ankle arthralgia • macular skin rash • hemorrhagic nasal crusting of uncertain etiology Clinical Procedure: -Specialty: Infectious Diseases Objective: Unusual clinical course Background:Brucellosis is a globally prevalent zoonosis caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella.It poses a persistent clinical challenge due to its propensity for chronicity, high relapse rates, and substantial underreporting.This report describes the case of a 72-year-old male land surveyor with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, a history of acute myocardial infarction, and type 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with chronic recurrent fever, orchiepididymitis, nasal ulcers, and skin rash due to brucellosis (undulant fever). Case Report:A 72-year-old male land surveyor with a decade-long history of recurrent fever, orchiepididymitis, and pulmonary granuloma developed acute fever, sweats, rash, and nasal crusting during hospitalization for myocardial infarction.Standard serological tests, blood cultures, and polymerase chain reaction assays were repeatedly negative during subsequent evaluation.A diagnosis of chronic-phase brucellosis was established based on occupational exposure to infected cattle (Brucella abortus), a historical reactive Rose Bengal test (1: 160), compatible clinical features, and systematic exclusion of alternative etiologies (vasculitis, tuberculosis, fungal infections, and endocarditis).Sustained remission was eventually achieved with an individualized 6-month empiric rescue regimen comprising 3 antimicrobial agents (doxycycline, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin).The patient completed 6 months of post-treatment follow-up without recurrence. Conclusions:Establishing a diagnosis of chronic-phase brucellosis remains challenging when contemporaneous microbiological and serological assays are negative.In such contexts, a detailed occupational history, compatible clinical features, and systematic exclusion of alternative etiologies are critical to guide clinical management.Baseline endocrine comorbidities should be considered strictly as hypothesis-generating contextual factors, rather than established causal drivers of bacterial persistence.