Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 8, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We present MicroSim, a system for binary code similarity detection that represents each function as a graph built from IDA Pro Hex-Rays microcode and compares such graphs with a contrastive Siamese graph neural network (GNN). We evaluate on the TREX cross-optimization benchmark, a corpus of 849,072 function-level microcode graphs spanning optimization levels -O0 through -O3, under a strict class-disjoint split in which no function key is shared between train and test. Under this protocol, MicroSim reaches 0.9972 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and 0.9762 Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), outperforming Gemini (0.9332 ROC-AUC), SAFE (0.9752), and jTrans (0.9740) retrained on the same split, as well as a structure-free Bag-of-Words (BoW) baseline (0.9484). We analyze the gap between pair classification and ranked retrieval in graph transformers, showing that Cross-domain Similarity Local Scaling (CSLS) under unified tie-resolved evaluation raises GraphGPS mean reciprocal rank (MRR) from 0.2542 to 0.2559 (R@1 = 0.1639, R@10 = 0.4561), strictly satisfying the theoretical MRR upper bound. Finally, over 5 seeds with equal compute, the pairwise cosine-embedding loss attains a slightly higher ROC-AUC (Δ = -0.0256, 95% confidence interval [-0.3282, +0.2770]), whereas the supervised-contrastive information noise-contrastive estimation (InfoNCE) loss is significantly better on thresholded classification and ranked retrieval.