Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 15, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Genetic and drug perturbation screens are important tools for elucidating disease mechanisms and validating therapeutic targets, but experimental costs limit the number of candidates that can be tested. Existing perturbation screening methods typically update the surrogate model with feedback while keeping the acquisition function fixed, limiting their ability to adapt selection to different response landscapes. Experimental feedback reveals current hits and informs subsequent selection by updating candidate predictions, providing a training signal for learning how to select experiments. We formulate budgeted perturbation discovery as a sequential decision problem and propose Temporal Difference Active Learning (TDAL), which learns an acquisition function online through temporal difference learning from a single screening trajectory, accounting for current hits and future discoveries. TDAL uses the Hellinger distance between hit probabilities for unmeasured candidates before and after an experiment to weight successor value, and reuses measured outcomes through leave-batch-out (LBO) to construct virtual transitions and alleviate training data scarcity. Across eight public screens spanning single, double, and triple perturbations under varied experimental configurations, TDAL achieves an average rank of 1.63 among eleven methods and ranks first on four tasks, demonstrating its adaptability across response landscapes.