Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
The Lancet. Planetary Health
A consensus or society position rather than new primary data.
This is a conceptual framework paper proposing e-co-flourishing—an integrative approach linking human wellbeing with ecological and collective flourishing—intended to guide future research and innovation across mental health, public health, sustainability, and planetary health. It includes methodological guidance, guiding principles, and hypothesised mechanisms but does not present empirical validation or outcome data.
Journal article. Practitioners, researchers, and decision makers working at the interface of mental health, public health, sustainability, and planetary health..
Framework includes methodological approach, guiding principles, programme theory with hypothesised outcomes, pathways of change, contextual factors, and intervention characteristics. MBCT-BLUE (Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy-Balanced Living for Us and the Earth's Ocean) presented as illustrative application of the framework.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
This framework is intended as a resource for practitioners and researchers to identify, refine, develop, and evaluate interventions with potential to promote wellbeing across human and ecological systems. It does not provide direct clinical evidence for implementation but offers conceptual scaffolding for future research and innovation.
A conceptual framework proposing e-co-flourishing as an integrative approach to wellbeing across human and ecological systems, with illustrative application but no empirical outcome data or comparative evidence.
As stated by the source record.
This framework is intended as a resource for practitioners and researchers to identify, refine, develop, and evaluate interventions with potential to promote wellbeing across human and ecological systems. It does not provide direct clinical evidence for implementation but offers conceptual scaffolding for future research and innovation.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no reported figures. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Converging ecological and social crises have exposed the limits of prevailing models of human progress, highlighting the need for more inclusive and interdisciplinary approaches to advancing wellbeing and flourishing across human and non-human life. In this Personal View, we propose an ecological-collective-flourishing (e-co-flourishing) approach, whereby one's own human flourishing is pursued along with that of natural ecosystems and their collective and individual constituents. We offer a heuristic translational framework that includes a methodological approach; guiding principles; and proposed programme theory in terms of hypothesised outcomes, pathways of change (mechanisms), key contextual factors (moderators), and intervention characteristics. This framework aims to bridge theory to real-world applications of e-co-flourishing interventions that are effective, scalable, and promote change through targeted mechanisms of action. We present Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy-Balanced Living for Us and the Earth's Ocean (MBCT-BLUE) as an illustrative application of this framework to outline how the framework can be used to identify, refine, develop, and evaluate interventions with e-co-flourishing potential. We also provide definitions of key conceptual terms and proxy measurements. Practitioners, researchers, and decision makers working at the interface of mental health, public health, sustainability, and planetary health can use this framework and its resources to guide emerging research and innovation.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.