Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Medicine India · September 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Mpox, formerly known as monkeypox, has transformed from a primarily animal-borne infection into a significant public health concern centered within human sexual networks. Historically, most mpox cases resulted from zoonotic transmission, humans becoming infected through direct contact with infected animals or their bodily fluids. However, since 2022, mpox’s epidemiology has shifted dramatically. The infection is now spreading predominantly through close, intimate human interactions, especially sexual contact. Recent global outbreaks highlight this evolution: clusters of cases appear in sexual networks, with a marked rise among men who have sex with men and a predominance of genital and mucosal symptoms. This new reality challenges previous assumptions about mpox, blurring the line between a classic zoonosis and a sexually transmitted infection. In this review, we will examine the scientific evidence behind mpox’s shift toward sexual transmission, discuss the emerging hurdles in clinical recognition and management, and explore the broader implications for sexual health, public health messaging, and future outbreak preparedness.