Loading
Digital Support Programme / Cardiac Arrest (CA) · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 10, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned, actively recruiting randomized trial comparing a web-based behavioural support programme plus standard care to standard care alone in cardiac arrest survivors. The study aims to measure change in overall wellbeing at 3 months as its primary endpoint, with secondary measures of quality of life, cognitive function, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and fatigue. No results have been posted to the registry; the trial is in the enrollment phase and outcomes are not yet available.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Single masking, Supportive Care purpose. Cardiac Arrest (CA); age from 18 Years. Intervention: Web-Based Support Programme for Cardiac Arrest Survivors. Compared with: Waitlist Control (Standard Care + Delayed Access) — No Intervention. n = 120. 9 sites: Sweden.
This is a planned, actively recruiting randomized trial comparing a web-based behavioural support programme plus standard care to standard care alone in cardiac arrest survivors. The study aims to measure change in overall wellbeing at 3 months as its primary endpoint, with secondary measures of quality of life, cognitive function, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and fatigue. No results have been posted to the registry; the trial is in the enrollment phase and outcomes are not yet available.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is a clinical trial registry record describing a planned interventional study with no results yet posted; enrollment is ongoing and outcomes have not been assessed.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07240714). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Linkoeping University. Recruitment status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 120 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Cardiac Arrest (CA). Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: Digital Support Programme. Primary outcome measures: Change from Baseline in Overall Wellbeing at 3 months. , From baseline to 3 months after enrollment.. Brief summary: The overall goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a web-based support programme can improve wellbeing in cardiac arrest survivors by helping them manage emotional, cognitive, and physical challenges. The study also explores how the programme is used and experienced in practice. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can access to a web-based support programme improve overall wellbeing in cardiac arrest survivors? * Can it also enhance quality of life, cognitive function, life satisfaction, and sleep, while reducing anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and fatigue? Researchers will compare cardiac arrest survivors who receive a web-based support programme in addition to standard care with those who receive standard care alone, to see if the programme improves wellbeing and other health outcomes. After the study, the control group will also gain access to the programme. Participants will: * Be asked to complete online questionnaires at three time points: at the start of the study, after 3 months, and after 6 months. * Be encouraged to use a web-based support programme for 3 months, with unlimited access, at their own pace and according to their individual needs (intervention group only).
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.