Life sciences · Journal article
Discover Oncology · October 28, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Background EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas MET pathway activation is a recognized bypass mechanism in acquired resistance. The clinical relevance of pretreatment MET amplification or marked MET protein overexpression is less well defined. Methods We report three older patients (aged 77, 80, and 91 years) with advanced EGFR L858R-mutant NSCLC and pretreatment MET abnormalities. Cases 1 and 2 received first-line aumolertinib monotherapy and experienced early disease progression, with progression-free survival (PFS) of approximately 1.2 and 2.5 months, respectively. Case 3 received first-line pemetrexed plus furmonertinib and second-line pemetrexed plus carboplatin before third-line aumolertinib plus savolitinib in a salvage setting. Results After combined EGFR/MET inhibition with aumolertinib plus savolitinib or glumetinib, all three patients achieved partial responses. Cases 1 and 2 also showed marked improvement in malignant pleural effusions. PFS on dual therapy was 6 months in Case 1, 4 months and ongoing at the reported follow-up in Case 2, and 4 months in Case 3. No grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported. Conclusion In these clinically heterogeneous cases, inadequate disease control before MET-directed treatment was followed by radiographic responses during combined EGFR/MET inhibition. These observations are biologically consistent with MET-mediated bypass signaling and support further prospective evaluation of pretreatment MET dysregulation as a potential modifier of EGFR-TKI sensitivity. The findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish a predictive biomarker or justify routine upfront dual EGFR/MET inhibition.