Life sciences · Journal article
Circulation Journal · October 9, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is rapidly increasing in Japan in parallel with population aging, rising from just over half of all heart failure cases in 2015 to approximately 54% in 2025 and projected to reach nearly 57% by 2040–2050. HFpEF is a multifactorial syndrome shaped by diverse clinical and pathophysiological drivers. In East Asia, where obesity is less prevalent than in Western countries, the relative contribution of these different drivers may differ, underscoring the need for region-specific phenotypic characterization. In recent years, multiple Japanese registries have reported machine learning-based phenotyping analyses in HFpEF, identifying broadly similar but not identical patient clusters. In this position paper, we provide an integrative overview of major Japanese HFpEF cohorts and synthesize these findings to propose a pragmatic consensus framework for interpreting HFpEF heterogeneity in Japan. Despite methodological differences across cohorts, several clinical domains consistently emerged, including atrial remodeling/atrial fibrillation, vascular–cardiorenal dysfunction, metabolic burden, and systemic vulnerability. Based on these shared features, we propose 4 consensus phenogroups: (1) low structural and comorbidity burden; (2) vascular and cardiorenal remodeling; (3) atrial remodeling with right heart dysfunction; and (4) systemic vulnerability. This framework may support interpretation of HFpEF heterogeneity and guide future phenotype-informed research.