Life sciences · Journal article
Biomarkers · October 13, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), a tight junction protein largely confined to normal gastric mucosa, is overexpressed and mislocalized on the surface of gastric, gastroesophageal, pancreatic, and other gastrointestinal cancers. This pattern has made CLDN18.2 a leading target in solid tumor immunotherapy. This review traces its path from a structural junctional component to a clinically relevant antigen and assesses the therapeutic platforms built around it. We discuss monoclonal antibodies, especially zolbetuximab, whose phase III SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials improved survival in CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and led to regulatory approval. We then evaluate antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and CAR T-cell therapies, comparing their mechanisms, efficacy, toxicity, and resistance. We also examine the rationale for combining CLDN18.2-directed agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors, although clinical evidence for synergy remains indirect. Major challenges include antigen loss and heterogeneity, autophagy-mediated ADC resistance, on-target gastrointestinal toxicity, cytokine release syndrome, and unstandardized expression thresholds. Because optimal cutoffs differ by modality, patient selection should follow the intended therapeutic class rather than a universal biomarker score. Overall, CLDN18.2-directed therapy is a maturing precision oncology strategy; its impact will depend on randomized data, better biomarkers, and rational combinations.