Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 1, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Simulation and experimental measurements provide complementary data for learning spatiotemporal physical systems, but standard simulation-to-experiment fine-tuning optimizes only the experimental objective after transfer and can degrade simulation performance. We formulate simulation--experiment prediction as a multi-objective learning problem with domain-specific simulation and experimental risks. On four fluid systems from RealPDEBench and two model capacities, we compare Simulation only, Experiment only, Sim$\rightarrow$Exp, and Joint training, evaluating every final model on both held-out domains. Sim$\rightarrow$Exp tends to specialize more strongly to experimental data at the cost of simulation-domain forgetting. Joint training consistently achieves the best balanced performance over a broad range of simulation--experiment evaluation weightings, while substantially improving simulation retention over Sim$\rightarrow$Exp. Joint also better preserves simulation-only fields absent from experimental measurements. Project page: https://mahindrautela.github.io/morph.