Loading
Pink and Pearl Campaign / Lung Cancer · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 12, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a prospective, single-site implementation study evaluating whether the Pink and Pearl Campaign—an awareness and referral intervention delivered within mammography clinics—increases lung cancer screening uptake among eligible women. The study combines quantitative measurement of screening completion rates with qualitative exploration of individual and health system barriers; results are not yet available in this registry record.
Interventional, Non Randomized, Parallel, Open label, Screening purpose. Lung Cancer, Cancer of the Lung; age from 20 Years; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: Participants - scheduled for mammography and eligible for L…. Compared with: Providers — No Intervention. n = 5,515. 1 site: United States.
This is a prospective, single-site implementation study evaluating whether the Pink and Pearl Campaign—an awareness and referral intervention delivered within mammography clinics—increases lung cancer screening uptake among eligible women. The study combines quantitative measurement of screening completion rates with qualitative exploration of individual and health system barriers; results are not yet available in this registry record.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is a registry record for an ongoing interventional study with no results yet reported; recruitment is active and the design is exploratory mixed-methods implementation research without a control arm.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07146568). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Washington University School of Medicine. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 5515 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Lung Cancer, Cancer of the Lung. Interventions: OTHER: Pink and Pearl Campaign. Primary outcome measures: Proportion of women referred from the breast radiology service who successfully complete LCS 6-months post-Pink & Pearl implementation , At 6 months. Brief summary: Inspired by the ongoing Pink \& Pearl Campaign, the breast radiology service of Christian Hospital in north St. Louis County will partner with Siteman Cancer Center to pilot this campaign in its mammography clinics in order to promote awareness, referral, and completion of lung cancer screening (LCS) among eligible women. This campaign leverages established infrastructure such as nurse navigation and referral to screening or primary care for further shared decision-making on cancer screening. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pink \& Pearl Campaign in improving LCS uptake among LCS-eligible women undergoing mammography at Christian Hospital. This evaluation is grounded in the Integrated Screening Action Model that depicts individual- and environmental-level influences on the screening behavior process. Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, which combines both quantitative and qualitative approaches, our specific aims for this proposal are to: a) assess whether the Pink \& Pearl Campaign increases referrals and uptake/completion of LCS among LCS-eligible women undergoing screening mammography; b) determine median time-to-screening after referral to LCS; and c) evaluate individual and health system factors influencing LCS uptake and implementation outcomes of the campaign. These implementation outcomes will help identify whether the campaign was put in place successfully or not. This proposal will inform strategies for integrating cancer screening programs to improve poorly performing programs like LCS.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.