Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Bridging independent vision-language models (VLMs) and small language models (SLMs) in a modular multi-agent system typically forces them to exchange information as discrete text, which creates a lossy bottleneck for spatial and fine-grained details. This constraint is especially acute for SLMs, whose limited capacity makes them more reliant on the quality of the input signal. Recent latent-communication methods exchange states between language models. How a VLM can pass visual information to a separately pretrained text-only SLM though remains unexplored. We propose \textbf{Latent-Lens}, a lightweight codec that bridges the representation gap between a frozen VLM and a frozen SLM directly in latent space, enabling them to communicate purely through hidden states. The codec consists of a domain encoder that projects hidden states from the VLM into the SLM's embedding space, and an attention decoder formalised as a LoRA that teaches the SLM to attend to these visual prefixes, while training only ${\sim}1.6$M parameters (0.2\% of the combined model size). On visual question answering (CLEVR, GQA), Latent-Lens achieves $81.0\pm7.9$\% and $65.4\pm5.4$\%, compared with $58.3\pm5.7$\% and $61.8\pm1.0$\% for text communication with the same LoRA budget (+30.2--69.8pp relative to frozen text communication), while on image captioning (Flickr8k) it improves over the same baseline by +16.5 (+18.8 frozen). We also evaluate Latent-Lens with TinyLlama-1.1B and InternVL2-1B, which use different architectures, vocabularies, and hidden dimensions.