Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Frontiers in Public Health · October 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Introduction Globally, Master of Public Health (MPH) programmes provide essential skills in epidemiology, health policy, and management and prepare graduates to tackle complex health challenges across the lifespan, and to strengthen health systems. This study is a critical analysis of the evolution of MPH programmes in post-apartheid South Africa and the complex interplay between historical legacies, health system transformation, and shifting national and global public health priorities. Methods An exploratory, descriptive qualitative study combined in-depth interviews with key informants and a review of relevant documents on the evolution of MPH programmes. The interviews explored stakeholder perspectives on the evolution, development and transformation of MPH programmes, while the document review examined the historical development and evolution of MPH and postgraduate public health training in South Africa. Data were analysed thematically. Results MPH programmes emerged in the context of profound socio-political change following South Africa’s democratic transition in 1994. These programmes were developed to address health workforce gaps, redress apartheid-era inequities, and cultivate a multidisciplinary cadre of health worker equipped to respond to the country’s growing burden of disease and determinants of health. However, MPH programmes have been shaped by the tension between global public health standards and local contextual realities, variation in institutional capacity in different universities, and the need to balance academic rigour with practical relevance for a diverse health workforce. Notwithstanding several innovations, insufficient government investment and the lack of career pathways for MPH graduates remain unresolved issues. Conclusion MPH programmes in South Africa were shaped by contextual drivers and institutional dynamics, with ongoing developments linked to national efforts to address inequities inherited from apartheid and to build a multidisciplinary workforce capable of implementing population-based health strategies. Future research should compare public health curricula across South African institutions.